Nickel, merci !

osm.org/relation/14414976/history
C'est à dire "A contrôler sur le terrain !!!" ? Est-il bien nécessaire que toute la relation soit placée en fixme ? Ne vaudrait-il pas mieux indiquer une portion seule, voire éviter d'intégrer l'information (jusqu'à atteindre un bon niveau de confiance) si elle est trop bancale ?

Hi, thank you! :)

I admit the latest tag (man_made=charge_point) added confusion, partially because the edited Wiki was, back then, quite unclear about this. But glad we're on the same line!

However, those tag were coming straight from https://nsi.guide/ (that can be added to JOSM and is, if I'm correct, natively supported by iD).

Not sure about the name practice, I consider this being abusive, any bank, townhall (… that's a debate here) could then have the city name included. I will follow the doc if it's what the community wants, but…

Thank you for your work & message! Keep going! 😉

RAS : https://postimg.cc/1nb4xRCg

Doublement pas sûr de comprendre…

Salut,
Je ne comprends pas ce que tu veux dire dans ce genre de fixme osm.org/node/11303255239 ? Concrètement, quel est le problème, et quelle solution est attendue ?
Merci.

…

1. The Wiki after the new attribute was voted
2. It was undiscussed
3. All the modified objects where verified before edit. Aerial imagery, name and others attributes. It's no different from an usual edit I can chairmap.

I know the rules about mechanical or blind edits, I read and re-read the Wiki, it was not the case, it was done very carefully.

Hi Andy,
It was not a mechanical edit. ;)
Thanks!

No, the correct tag is narrow... osm.wiki/Key:narrow

You don't need to teach me things I already know, but thanks anyway…

In another hand, the "duplicate info" doesn't seems to be a valid argument anymore... osm.org/changeset/138835692

I sometimes understand less and less the logic and what should I do.

Well, as you can see, only a portion of this narrow street is oneway.
There's no indication at the beginning (C12 sign) and the street is so narrow that we could think it is for pedestrians only.
That's why I consider that every informations adds a layer of detail, making it easier to understand what's on the ground.

Whatever, do whatever you want, but unsure to check the presets (in this case, it is one I added to JOSM, don't remember the name) to "fix" the problem at the source.

True, but in this case where the street is slightly weird, adding as much infos as we can is a great benefit.
And more generally, it adds a level of details. I'm not sure I will change my habits on this, but I get your point, it makes more sense adding it when it's both ways you're right . :)

osm.org/node/7027388809/history

What?

J'ai enfin revert.
Super, merci ! :D

Oui apparemment, bon. J'ai ajusté en conséquence, et je le referais dès qu'il y aura du nouveau dans leur guéguerre.

Hi!
I have some questions:
1. Since you added the buildings, why have you kept the constructions areas?
Like osm.org/way/1207296610 osm.org/way/1207296600 osm.org/way/1207296595

2. You added some electric lines like osm.org/way/1311714569, have you spotted them during survey? Map overlay "Volta" says those line are underground, Volta is usually great but sometimes, not.

3. You seems to have redrawed every building using aerial image, using roof as a reference instead of the base of the building. Does the Wiki recommandations have changed recently?

4. The address nodes are now merged with building, while the trend (in France) tends the move it to a node, due to the complexity of how we define an address (building ≠ address). Why? :'(

Tho, thanks for your contributions.

Pffiou, compliqué à suivre leurs histoires là… Merci de l'info. Je pourrais sûrement annuler ça demain, à moins d'être précédé. Merci du retour !

PS : ça n'est pas la première fois que tu m'aborde sur la question du ski, tu connais bien le sujet du point de vue OSM ? Est-ce que je pourrais te solliciter pour des conseils/vérifications à ce propos ? (Ex : via Signal, Mastodon, ou simplement ici.) Merci. :)

Hello, elle fait partie des pistes comme Piquemiette ayant fermée. De ce que j'ai compris, la décision n'a pas été annulée. :/

Pareil pour https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/207308097, il faut parfois rajouter des accents.

Et pour d'autres comme osm.org/way/1297584390 et osm.org/way/1297584391, la tendance est aussi à créer un point avec place=hamlet|locality|isolated_dwelling (cf. osm.wiki/FR:Tag:place%3Dhamlet) et coller le nom du lieu-dit, plutôt que sur la voirie.
Ex : osm.org/node/5030046720

Après de mémoire il n'y a pas non plus de consensus en France sur s'il faut utiliser hamlet/locality/isolated_dwelling. Bref, on fait au mieux…

Début de la guerre d'édition, je vous laisse accorder vos violons. ;)
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/397847503
(osm.org/way/397847503/history)

(l'autre cartographe a également été informé)

Début de la guerre d'édition, je vous laisse accorder vos violons. ;)
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/397847503
(osm.org/way/397847503/history)

(l'autre cartographe a également été informé)

osm.org/changeset/153354227

osm.org/way/1297584394

Il est généralement inutile voire redondant de nommer les voies de service de la même manière que les voies résidentielles, j'annulerais ces contributions. Néanmoins, merci pour l'intégration des autres voies !