- #1

morrobay

Gold Member

- 806

- 349

violation ? Preferably a local non realistic model based on mechanisms.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter morrobay
- Start date

- #1

morrobay

Gold Member

- 806

- 349

violation ? Preferably a local non realistic model based on mechanisms.

- #2

PAllen

Science Advisor

- 8,483

- 1,754

violation ? Preferably a local non realistic model based on mechanisms.

Any interpretation that does not predict observed violations of the bell inequalities would immediately be rejected. Thus, all remotely serious philosophic interpretations of QM predict Bell inequality violations.

- #3

naima

Gold Member

- 938

- 54

The "shut up calculate" interpretation perfectly describes the Bell inequality violation.

- #4

- 1,948

- 201

- #5

Nugatory

Mentor

- 13,538

- 6,709

None. All interpretations of QM lead to the same math. The only difference is the interpretation of the math.

I think you meant "all of them"?

- #6

- 1,948

- 201

I think you meant "all of them"?

I guess so, because QM violates the inequality. I meant to say that none of them violate the results predicted by QM for the experiment proposed by Bell, which is not the same thing, granted.

Share: