At work1, I started creating a real pedestrian routing that uses sidewalks rather than the middle of the road (unlike most pedestrian routing software nowadays). This is necessary for calculating safe routes to and from schools. In this case, it really matters which side of the road the children use and which crossing they take.
The OSM community mainly uses two methods of mapping sidewalks (and the choice between these two methods directly influences the mapping of crossings): One option is to attach them as tags to the road (for example sidewalk=both
), and the other is to use separate geometry. In this post, I would like to show an example where mapping the geometry separately makes a huge difference.
A Dangerous Crossing
The image shows one of Germany’s most dangerous places for pedestrians, according to accident statistics 2. This crossing is located near Rothe Erde in Aachen.
The following figure, taken from a screenshot of JOSM, shows the OSM data for this crossing.3