Updating Sorbisches Siedlungsgebiet to use the new approved tag boundary=aboriginal_lands
Closed about 1 year ago by ZeLonewolf
That's wrong! The border of the Sorbian settlement area is not the same as aboriginal_lands.
The border only marks official bilingualismThat's wrong! The border of the Sorbian settlement area is not the same as aboriginal_lands.
The border only marks official bilingualism in the region.. There is no own administration and so on. protect_class=24 is most likely to come close to this situation.
Is this mass edit announced? I asked the DWG...
My bad, I researched this area on Wikipedia and it seemed like aboriginal_lands alone was a sufficient fit (which is also supported by renderers). I understand if you wish to revert the change.
The whole proposal of boundary=aboriginal_lands was nonsense.
The boundary=protected_area scheme is exquisite and nicely structured. It is applicable to everything.
Even the other efforts such as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_Named_protection_class_for_protected_areas are pure nonsense and only lead to chaos...
Yes, I understand your preference for protect_class=24 in this case.
Log in to join the discussion
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by UCL, Fastly, Bytemark Hosting, and other partners.