OpenStreetMap

Guten Tag,
was soll denn hier falsch gewesen sein?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338507616/history

Hi! Thank you for your message. I made a mistake and already fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91121332.

Hallo,

zur Info. Alle von mir im Süden Baden-Württemberg überprüften wikidata/wikipedia Informationen waren korrekt und wurden von mir wieder hergestellt (partial revert CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91065307).

Wouldn’t it make more sense to just cleanly revert this CS? I checked a few changes, some are fine, others are not. Or do we have a volunteer to go through 800 wiki pages one-by-one?

This very much looks like a mechanical edit, I highly doubt the user checked all this by hand. Was it announced anywhere?

Hi limes11! I deleted wikidata that doesn't match the places where It was used. I announced in telegram chat - https://t.me/OSM_de/41579. There is also a link to the table where were validated all these places. If there are changes that you do not agree with, please write to me. I will be happy to answer all your questions. Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90978611

Where is the discussion in advance of your edit? As all mechanical edits have to be discussed, in advance, please, revert completly and start a discussion about your intention

Thanks skyper.

+1 to revert because undocumented and undiscussed automated edit

This is a strong violation of the automated edits guidline (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) Your are working for MapBox, right? As a long term participant in the OSM surroundings I expect from MapBox and their staff to be familiar with OSM and the guidlines and doing proper and responsible work.

Following the comments and the forum discussion

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70663

I reverted this changeset for the lack of prior discussion through the appropriate channels. The guideline link was posted above. In fact, the forum is a good platform to discuss the intention of your changes and you are welcome to contribute also in English.

Contentwise, I agree that many of these wiki links for small mills or isolated dwellings are inappropriate, but I found several incorrect deletions while only checking a very small proportion of the affected objects.

Oh, wo ist den die Identifizierung, dass dies ein Änderungssatz von einem angestellten Mapbox Mitarbeiter ist? Wo ist der HashTag des Task.

Bitte weise, deinen Chef auf die Richtlinien hin.

Bis wann kann ich mit den Hashtags rechnen?

Wo ist die offene Kommunikationsplattform?

Private Mails und Telegram does not count!