Nonstandard/wrong colour designation on some paths http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=504481#p504481
You changed the tagging of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346149552#map=18/32.76804/35.02787 from highway=track to highway=unclassified. Could I double-check that that's correct? It would be unusual for a road inside a forest to be "unclassified".
I have not been there personally, I just adjusted the highway tag to match the description (name) and the surface tag.
The non-name you deleted was "Paved road..." and the surface tag is "paved". Therefore, it is not a track.
It is not unusual to have sections paved roads in forests in order to keep them accessible in winter.
Thanks for the reply.
Considering https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified , I think this road is not an "unclassified" road: it is not interconnecting, it is not used for local traffic.
Since https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track says that highway=track "may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps", I would guess that highway=track,surface=paved would actually be correct in this case.
So, I suggest that we either change this section to highway=track,surface=paved , or alternatively change it to highway=road, which is the "survey needed" value of highway=*.
Please refer to the Israel wiki page for the highway tag classification
Perhaps the IL wiki is conflicting with the global guidelines in this regard; we're using track exclusively for unpaved.
Let's discuss this further on the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=670142#p670142
...dedicated thread here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=673613
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by UCL, Bytemark Hosting, and other partners.