OpenStreetMap

Hi, has this automated edit followed any of the guidelines, a forum post with 5 hours notice, that’s not even on the main OSM forum, isn’t how you propose an automated edit.

And looking at that forum post, busway=designated isn’t an access tag, you’ve replaced non-accesss tagging with access tagging, removing information to satisfy a QA tool, I think this changeset should be reverted.

It certainly is some good food for thought, at least, since busway=designated feels fairly nonsensical (since the intention is to denote bus lanes only) and are supposed to be "bus=designated" or "highway=busway" depending on the context.

Still, first some throughout discussion then the edit.

Absolutely good food for thought, but it’s the kind of thing that needs community feedback first, or to be done on a one by one basis by reviewing aerial imagery, and confirming that other data (I.e. the route relations) isn’t where the fault actually is

Revert undiscussed automated edit

osm.org/changeset/157646853

Je m'excuse : j' ai fait une requête overpass avec 'area[name="Bretagne"]->.a;' et j'ai édité les attributs avec level0.
Je n'ai pas remarqué que les ways n'étaient pas uniquement en France/Bretagne.
Le revert est parfaitement justifié, merci fortera_au

Not a problem.

I'd still recommend engaging with the community just as much for a global change as you would for a more local one, you'd just obviously be able to focus on local communities instead of the global OSM community for feedback.