OpenStreetMap

Socks's notes

Notes submitted or commented on by Socks

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
open 150388 Andrew Chadwick

First up: great work on this area, people!

Could a better (less highly visible on all renderings) notation be found for the subterranean bits?

"Building" seems somewhat wrong for the Gladstone Link tunnel (more of a delving?), perhaps best left as a simple tunnel.

I'd suggest building:part=yes areas (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part) for the subterranean parts, like the rad cam dome. Leave them not tagged with building=yes, since we already have a separate area for "the above-ground outline of the building".

Sort of a "principle of least surprise" thing: users of the map expect a single outline reflecting the above-ground stuff.

about 1 year ago 12 days ago
open 382690 SomeoneElse

Bicycle access on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57833863/history is set to a non-value. Presumably some local knows the legal situation?

18 days ago 14 days ago
closed 316218

The Iqra school closed in 2009/10 and haas been replaced by a housing development on a new road called Lawn Upton Close.

5 months ago 24 days ago
closed 332401

The "Far From the Madding Crowd" is closed as of 24th January 2015. See http://www.maddingcrowd.co.uk/

It's currently empty...

4 months ago 3 months ago
closed 309497 Math1985

Does this restaurant still exist?

5 months ago 5 months ago
closed 309512 Math1985

Does this still exist?

5 months ago 5 months ago
closed 250741

Turn down here when coming from town

9 months ago 5 months ago
closed 112535 m902

Moved from OpenStreetBugs:
-
Description: What's the height limit for getting into this car park? [Duncan, 2013-05-21 15:41:06 CEST]

over 1 year ago 6 months ago
open 293733 voschix

Roundabout layout changed. There is now a cut-through road across the roundabout. Traffic lights are missing as well

6 months ago 6 months ago
closed 161005 SK53

Oxford may actually have an active and vibrant community of Quakers, but two big houses cheek-by-jowl seems unlikely, History of this building suggests that this is labelled incorrectly.

about 1 year ago 6 months ago

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »