OpenStreetMap

Socks's notes

Notes submitted or commented on by Socks

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
closed 293590 Math1985

Is the B&M Bargains in http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1834060729 really shop=department_store rather than shop=variety_store?

over 1 year ago 26 days ago
closed 284019 Math1985

Poundland shops are usually better tagged as shop=variety_store rather than shop=supermarket.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store

Please use local knowledge to confirm this.

over 1 year ago 26 days ago
closed 176573 Andrew Chadwick

Doubled walls need fixing up here.

about 2 years ago 26 days ago
closed 176570 Andrew Chadwick

Doubled walls need fixing up here.

about 2 years ago 26 days ago
closed 176571 Andrew Chadwick

Doubled walls need fixing up here.

about 2 years ago 26 days ago
closed 176572 Andrew Chadwick

Doubled walls need fixing up here.

about 2 years ago 26 days ago
open 382690 SomeoneElse

Bicycle access on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57833863/history is set to a non-value. Presumably some local knows the legal situation?

about 1 year ago 3 months ago
open 293733 voschix

Roundabout layout changed. There is now a cut-through road across the roundabout. Traffic lights are missing as well

over 1 year ago 3 months ago
open 85003 Socks

This is recollection from when I last went along this path (approx 14 years ago), but there's footbridges with gates on and a pond around here (ie, between the river and the sports-ground).

over 2 years ago 3 months ago
open 150388 Andrew Chadwick

First up: great work on this area, people!

Could a better (less highly visible on all renderings) notation be found for the subterranean bits?

"Building" seems somewhat wrong for the Gladstone Link tunnel (more of a delving?), perhaps best left as a simple tunnel.

I'd suggest building:part=yes areas (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part) for the subterranean parts, like the rad cam dome. Leave them not tagged with building=yes, since we already have a separate area for "the above-ground outline of the building".

Sort of a "principle of least surprise" thing: users of the map expect a single outline reflecting the above-ground stuff.

over 2 years ago 7 months ago

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »