I've noticed that the use of identical boundary relations may cause display issue, witness 95672 and 95671. The first is a postal code (at
administrative_level=8 for some reason) with
name=3060. The other is the suburb (
The result is that depending on zoom the displayed name will alternate between "Fawkner" and "3060". Surely there is no need to list
name=3060?, and arguably a single relation could be done to cover both? Also I might be crazy but are postal code realy independent administrative units in need of their own boundary definitions?